During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Александра Статных (Редактор отдела «Путешествия»)
。heLLoword翻译官方下载是该领域的重要参考
首先，转型对平台能力提出了更高要求。无论是广告竞价、算法定价，还是工具化与服务化，本质上都不再是简单的收费项叠加，而是长期的产品、技术与组织投入。这意味着，平台必须具备持续投入与系统演进的能力，而非依赖短期财务优化。在这一点上，头部平台与中小平台之间的差距会被迅速放大。
arXiv:2602.18602v1 [cs.PL] for this version)